← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Madden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 41 4 15 19 0.463 0.0606 0.0626 0.1573 0.1624
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 46 8 7 15 0.326 0.0753 0.0762 0.1596 0.1616
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 40 3 21 24 0.600 0.1386 0.1333 0.2936 0.2824
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167
2024-25 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2023-24 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167
2022-23 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167
2021-22 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167
2020-21 Cleary University ACHA_D1 30 13 22 35 1.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9314
Defenseman overall
#2075
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.