IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Sutter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Eau Claire North (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.0821 0.0821 0.1619 0.1619
2023-24 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 44 21 28 49 1.114 0.1256 0.1195 0.3788 0.3604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 2 3 0.125
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 2 3 0.125
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 2 3 0.125
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Morrisville
+39.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10581
Forward overall
#470
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Moran
Worcester State · 2011-12
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Chase
Wentworth · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.