IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Fontaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 0 7 7 0.184 0.0426 0.0426 0.0901 0.0900
2023-24 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 6 14 20 0.526 0.1216 0.1153 0.2575 0.2442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 15 2 0 2 0.133
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 16 0 3 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Keene State
+154.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39803
Forward overall
#2486
Forward born in 2003
#1582
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Giordano
Connecticut College · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Decker
Assumption · 2021-22
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew DeAngelis
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.