IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kodi Dotterer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Exeter NE-Prep 28 12 14 26 0.929 0.1840 0.1840 0.4231 0.4231
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 48 1 10 11 0.229 0.0934 0.0949 0.1842 0.1872
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 47 3 14 17 0.362 0.1475 0.1415 0.2907 0.2789
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC — 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2024-25 · Tufts
+72.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6542
Defenseman overall
#1574
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Johnson
Hamline · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.