IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theo Angelopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Albany Academy NE-Prep 22 2 1 3 0.136 0.0263 0.0263 0.0624 0.0624
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 36 12 22 34 0.944 0.1382 0.1381 0.4630 0.4628
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 13 5 12 17 1.308 0.1913 0.1816 0.6412 0.6086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 6 2 0 2 0.333
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Skidmore
+18.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13580
Forward overall
#654
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Bevilacqua
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedan Cross
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.