IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Seacoast Spartans EHL 42 5 13 18 0.429 0.0920 0.0924 0.2099 0.2109
2024-25 Seacoast Spartans NCDC 56 11 11 22 0.393 0.1107 0.1041 0.3181 0.2990
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE — 25 6 3 9 0.360
2005-06 Babson D3 — SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2004-05 Babson D3 — JR 28 10 20 30 1.071
2003-04 Babson D3 — SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2002-03 Babson D3 — FR 23 6 12 18 0.783

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37414
Forward overall
#2102
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Walker
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Trujillo
Curry · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.