IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Worrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Georges NE-Prep 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0235 0.0235 0.0381 0.0381
2022-23 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 41 4 5 9 0.220 0.0772 0.0811 0.1076 0.1130
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 44 8 7 15 0.341 0.1200 0.1200 0.1671 0.1671
2024-25 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 19 4 5 9 0.474 0.1667 0.1581 0.2323 0.2204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE FR 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Roger Williams
+104.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40179
Forward overall
#2581
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Larry Niland
Elmira · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Hatcher
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wilkins
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.