IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Markowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 34 4 4 8 0.235 0.0473 0.0473 0.1076 0.1076
2022-23 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 36 14 15 29 0.806 0.1620 0.1620 0.3684 0.3684
2023-24 Northern Cyclones NCDC 51 20 18 38 0.745 0.3038 0.2979 0.5962 0.5847
2024-25 Northern Cyclones NCDC 54 27 25 52 0.963 0.3926 0.3675 0.7706 0.7214
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 21 2 3 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · St. John Fisher
-18.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7018
Forward overall
#250
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zikmund Mróz
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bancroft
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian McGilvrey
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.