IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Atkinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0293 0.0298 0.0981 0.0997
2024-25 — EHL 43 7 7 14 0.326 0.0476 0.0459 0.1596 0.1539
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE FR 17 1 1 2 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Western New England
+247.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30850
Forward overall
#1829
Forward born in 2004
#1008
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan McDowell
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson Vershay
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Marshall
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.