IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Kuba Jr. Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 41 10 19 29 0.707 0.0527 0.0527 0.1620 0.1620
2021-22 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 42 6 8 14 0.333 0.0376 0.0418 0.1134 0.1262
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 22 2 0 2 0.091 0.0210 0.0215 0.0735 0.0751
2024-25 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 40 5 6 11 0.275 0.0402 0.0398 0.1348 0.1336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE — 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Roger Williams
+225.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19455
Defenseman overall
#3436
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Rein
New England College · 2016-17
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Magus
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Butler
Colby · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.