← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kiki Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 NCDC 39 3 4 7 0.179 0.0732 0.0758 0.1443 0.1495
2023-24 Navan Grads CCHL 48 5 13 18 0.375 0.0813 0.0780 0.2901 0.2784
2024-25 Navan Grads CCHL 44 17 22 39 0.886 0.1923 0.1759 0.6858 0.6272
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
+6.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29704
Forward overall
#1755
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.