← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Bollinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-10 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Sartell USHS-MN 26 0 9 9 0.346 0.0932 0.0932 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Sartell USHS-MN 27 2 10 12 0.444 0.1196 0.1196 0.1079 0.1079
2023-24 Sartell USHS-MN 26 6 11 17 0.654 0.1760 0.1760 0.1588 0.1588
2024-25 Mason City Toros NA3HL 42 1 16 17 0.405 0.0488 0.0492 0.1279 0.1288
2025-26 Mason City Toros NA3HL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.0442 0.0423 0.1158 0.1107
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Stout
+430.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22774
Defenseman overall
#3639
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2016-17
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.