IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Holtan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0444 0.0447 0.1455 0.1465
2014-15 Wisconsin Whalers NA3HL 44 7 17 24 0.545 0.0685 0.0652 0.1722 0.1638
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 22 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2015-16 · Gustavus Adolphus
+271.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16538
Defenseman overall
#1872
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Griffiths
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Bisson
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Eliav
Neumann · 2024-25
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.