← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antonio Morran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-09 Country: Bermuda
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 45 2 4 6 0.133 0.0147 0.0160 0.0421 0.0459
2022-23 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 40 3 14 17 0.425 0.0470 0.0491 0.1342 0.1402
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.0398 0.0397 0.1137 0.1133
2024-25 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 46 7 15 22 0.478 0.0529 0.0500 0.1510 0.1426
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
+361.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17299
Defenseman overall
#3193
Defenseman born in 2004
#2853
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2010-11
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.