IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Vermont Academy NE-Prep 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0079 0.0079 0.0182 0.0182
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 23 1 1 2 0.087 0.0172 0.0172 0.0396 0.0396
2022-23 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 29 4 7 11 0.379 0.0751 0.0751 0.1728 0.1728
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 33 0 4 4 0.121 0.0280 0.0284 0.0593 0.0601
2024-25 Boston Jr. Eagles EHL 45 9 18 27 0.600 0.1386 0.1333 0.2936 0.2823
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 — 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Assumption
+16.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12614
Defenseman overall
#2571
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Norman
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
Hobart · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mense
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.