IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Mulligan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 38 8 36 44 1.158 0.0753 0.0760 0.2608 0.2632
2023-24 Boston Dogs EHL 42 3 4 7 0.167 0.0244 0.0248 0.0817 0.0832
2024-25 Boston Dogs NCDC 28 1 6 7 0.250 0.0578 0.0551 0.2021 0.1926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC — 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Misericordia
+69.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46783
Forward overall
#3173
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jim Ceglarek
Becker · 2005-06
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bower
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Hinterser
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.