IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Leivian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 40 13 16 29 0.725 0.0802 0.0794 0.2289 0.2266
2024-25 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 46 7 22 29 0.630 0.0697 0.0654 0.1990 0.1867
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 27 0 1 1 0.037
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2025-26 · Franklin Pierce
-39.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36013
Forward overall
#2218
Forward born in 2004
#1602
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Boelter
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Marcuz
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Manlow
New England College · 2011-12
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.