| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 53 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 0.472 | 0.2900 | 0.3075 | 1.3897 | 1.4736 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Brown | D1 | ECAC | SR | 31 | 7 | 19 | 26 | 0.839 |
| 2006-07 | Brown | D1 | ECAC | JR | 32 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 1.031 |
| 2005-06 | Brown | D1 | ECAC | SO | 32 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 0.938 |
| 2004-05 | Brown | D1 | ECAC | FR | 32 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.625 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.