IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Heaslip Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brooks School NE-Prep 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0241 0.0241 0.0572 0.0572
2022-23 Brooks School NE-Prep 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0231 0.0231 0.0549 0.0549
2023-24 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 3 12 15 0.349 0.0510 0.0521 0.1710 0.1746
2024-25 East Coast Wizards EHL 40 2 11 13 0.325 0.0475 0.0461 0.1593 0.1545
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17194
Defenseman overall
#3185
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Flack
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Nyman
Hamline · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Freiermuth
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.