IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Scherff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 39 2 8 10 0.256 0.0284 0.0307 0.0812 0.0877
2022-23 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 35 0 5 5 0.143 0.0161 0.0167 0.0486 0.0504
2024-25 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 44 1 9 10 0.227 0.0256 0.0238 0.0773 0.0718
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 19 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23577
Defenseman overall
#3856
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Malenstyn
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Taurence
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Stelzer
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.