IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-18 Country: Canada
2018 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #124  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 32 9 6 15 0.469 0.1408 0.1416 0.3209 0.3228
2014-15 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 54 15 25 40 0.741 0.2225 0.2123 0.5070 0.4838
2015-16 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 57 20 23 43 0.754 0.2409 0.2202 0.5840 0.5338
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Harvard D1 ECAC — 0 56 608 664 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26337
Forward overall
#1012
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.