← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elliott McDermott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 11 28 39 0.629 0.1364 0.1309 0.4867 0.4670
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 16 43 59 0.952 0.2064 0.2064 0.7363 0.7363
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC 35 3 15 18 0.514
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 35 0 2 2 0.057
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 35 1 2 3 0.086
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 40 2 11 13 0.325
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 22 2 4 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Colgate
+120.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4195
Defenseman overall
#992
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.