← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Campoli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-16 Country: Canada
2017 · Round 6, Pick #158  ·  Vegas Golden Knights Vegas Golden Knights
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 North York Rangers OJHL 37 12 22 34 0.919 0.2252 0.2466 0.6327 0.6928
2016-17 North York Rangers OJHL 20 9 23 32 1.600 0.3922 0.4119 1.1016 1.1568
2017-18 North York Rangers OJHL 46 20 29 49 1.065 0.2611 0.2616 0.7334 0.7349
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 34 5 2 7 0.206
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 22 3 2 5 0.227
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 29 2 6 8 0.276
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 39 4 5 9 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Clarkson
-16.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11457
Forward overall
#510
Forward born in 1999
#241
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.