← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Ierullo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-30 Country: Italy
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Milton Menace OJHL 53 10 17 27 0.509 0.1530 0.1544 0.3487 0.3519
2016-17 Milton Menace OJHL 47 16 25 41 0.872 0.2620 0.2527 0.5971 0.5758
2017-18 Milton Menace OJHL 52 25 41 66 1.269 0.3813 0.3494 0.8688 0.7960
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 39 16 26 42 1.077
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 29 7 17 24 0.828
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 37 7 14 21 0.568
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 31 6 3 9 0.290
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Bemidji State
+9.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16507
Forward overall
#727
Forward born in 1997
#712
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.