IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Haynes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Burlington Cougars OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Caledon Admirals OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Caledon Admirals OJHL 54 4 14 18 0.333 0.0817 0.0817 0.2295 0.2295
2020-21 Caledon Admirals OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Brockville Braves CCHL 53 4 33 37 0.698 0.1514 0.1450 0.5401 0.5174
2022-23 — CCHL 51 15 30 45 0.882 0.1914 0.1748 0.6827 0.6234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5734
Defenseman overall
#1407
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.