← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Garvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.2451 0.2756 0.6885 0.7743
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 15 22 37 0.755 0.1851 0.1851 0.5199 0.5199
2020-21 Collingwood Blues OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Collingwood Blues OJHL 32 13 14 27 0.844 0.2068 0.2024 0.5810 0.5687
2022-23 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 40 27 67 1.288 0.3158 0.2930 0.8871 0.8229
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 40 11 14 25 0.625
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 34 7 15 22 0.647
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 37 11 3 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · Robert Morris
+72.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15393
Forward overall
#789
Forward born in 2002
#489
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.