← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keegan Decaluwe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Burlington Cougars OJHL 44 5 9 14 0.318 0.0780 0.0805 0.2191 0.2260
2022-23 Burlington Cougars OJHL 38 7 8 15 0.395 0.0967 0.0948 0.2718 0.2665
2023-24 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 13 15 28 0.549 0.1346 0.1250 0.3780 0.3510
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 36 13 22 35 0.972

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39856
Forward overall
#2489
Forward born in 2003
#2534
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.