IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keegan Decaluwe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Burlington Cougars OJHL 44 5 9 14 0.318 0.0780 0.0805 0.2178 0.2247
2022-23 Burlington Cougars OJHL 38 7 8 15 0.395 0.0967 0.0948 0.2702 0.2649
2023-24 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 13 15 28 0.549 0.1346 0.1250 0.3758 0.3489
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 13 22 35 0.972

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39579
Forward overall
#2466
Forward born in 2003
#2531
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Costello
Canton · 2013-14
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Scott
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Marcoux
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.