← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Reisky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-12 Country: Canada
Arcadia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Caledon Admirals OJHL 42 3 4 7 0.167 0.0409 0.0424 0.1148 0.1190
2024-25 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 14 3 6 9 0.643 0.0841 0.0839 0.2182 0.2178
2025-26 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 4 9 13 0.241 0.0590 0.0549 0.1657 0.1543
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44414
Forward overall
#2911
Forward born in 2005
#3078
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Arcadia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.30
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arcadia
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arcadia

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.