IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Deacon King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-07 Country: Canada
Albertus Magnus
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Caledon Admirals OJHL 49 11 11 22 0.449 0.1100 0.1149 0.3091 0.3229
2024-25 Caledon Admirals OJHL 48 12 14 26 0.542 0.1328 0.1319 0.3730 0.3705
2025-26 — OJHL 56 19 24 43 0.768 0.1882 0.1767 0.5287 0.4963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30438
Forward overall
#1795
Forward born in 2005
#1605
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Albertus Magnus Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Scott Lawson
0.00
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Samuel Lozinski
0.71
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Cody Walker
0.40
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Kyler Campbell
0.40
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer DeRidder
Salem State · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Andrews
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2011-12
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.