IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Derito Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 41 3 10 13 0.317 0.0777 0.0783 0.2181 0.2198
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 29 8 23 31 1.069

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47903
Forward overall
#3218
Forward born in 2005
#3501
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Englebright
Nichols · 2005-06
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Angus Scott
Tufts · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hartviksen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.