IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Risser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — OJHL 45 7 4 11 0.244 0.0599 0.0576 0.1683 0.1618
2024-25 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 34 6 15 21 0.618 0.1427 0.1365 0.3022 0.2891
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 18 0 2 2 0.111

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35577
Forward overall
#2194
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zalewski
Buffalo State · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Shorrock
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.