IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Haeney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-05 Country: Canada
Chatham
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Caledon Admirals OJHL 40 3 5 8 0.200 0.0490 0.0482 0.1377 0.1356
2025-26 Caledon Admirals OJHL 30 1 9 10 0.333 0.0817 0.0760 0.2295 0.2135
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19828
Defenseman overall
#3450
Defenseman born in 2005
#3819
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Chatham Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicholas Cyprian
0.88
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Brendan Johns
0.20
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Matthew Bobko
0.00
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Ian Skinner
0.00
actual FR PPG at Chatham

D2/3 Comparables

Adam DiBrina
Curry · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Bowes
Endicott · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Bachnak
Adrian · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.