IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Aiello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0554 0.1510 0.1594
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Oakland University ACHA_D1 — — 26 5 7 12 0.462
2024-25 Oakland University ACHA_D1 — — 26 5 7 12 0.462
2023-24 Oakland University ACHA_D1 — — 26 5 7 12 0.462

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Sutliffe
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Adkins
Concordia · 2013-14
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Collins
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.