icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2003-04 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 42 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.214 | 0.0465 | 0.0490 | 0.1658 | 0.1749 |
| 2004-05 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 41 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.098 | 0.0212 | 0.0214 | 0.0755 | 0.0763 |
| 2006-07 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | SUNY Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.