IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Borowiecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-07-12 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 5, Pick #139  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 53 3 25 28 0.528 0.1146 0.1228 0.4087 0.4380
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 46 2 24 26 0.565 0.1226 0.1255 0.4373 0.4477
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 31 3 8 11 0.355
2009-10 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 35 8 11 19 0.543
2008-09 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 33 1 1 2 0.061
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2008-09 · Clarkson
-48.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8520
Defenseman overall
#1073
Defenseman born in 1989
#731
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Sköld
Westfield State · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Minns
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.