← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Sanniti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-12-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 5 28 33 0.559 0.1213 0.1199 0.4327 0.4278
2012-13 CCHL 22 4 19 23 1.046 0.2268 0.2142 0.8089 0.7640
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2015-16 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 37 0 2 2 0.054
2014-15 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2013-14 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3938
Defenseman overall
#725
Defenseman born in 1992
#326
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.