IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Pefley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 22 24 46 0.742 0.2369 0.2393 0.5743 0.5802
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 60 11 31 42 0.700 0.2235 0.2155 0.5419 0.5224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 29 5 10 15 0.517
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 20 4 3 7 0.350
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 28 4 15 19 0.679
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23930
Forward overall
#913
Forward born in 1995
#605
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Edward Griffin
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Drabin
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.