IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Pefley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 22 24 46 0.742 0.1609 0.1625 0.5740 0.5799
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 60 11 31 42 0.700 0.1518 0.1463 0.5416 0.5221
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 29 5 10 15 0.517
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 20 4 3 7 0.350
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 28 4 15 19 0.679
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24158
Forward overall
#920
Forward born in 1995
#487
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Edward Griffin
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassidy Bowes
Endicott · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.