← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Petersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 USHL 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.2213 0.2167 1.0606 1.0387
2004-05 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1639 0.1523 0.7858 0.7300
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Salve Regina D3 JR 25 5 14 19 0.760
2008-09 Salve Regina D3 SO 22 13 14 27 1.227
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 SR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2007-08 Salve Regina D3 FR 22 5 3 8 0.364
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 JR 32 9 12 21 0.656
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 SO 30 13 7 20 0.667
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 FR 29 7 8 15 0.517
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2005-06 · St. Norbert
+239.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30149
Forward overall
#855
Forward born in 1984
#2859
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.