| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | — | USHL | 25 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.360 | 0.2213 | 0.2167 | 1.0606 | 1.0387 |
| 2004-05 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 60 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.267 | 0.1639 | 0.1523 | 0.7858 | 0.7300 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Salve Regina | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.760 |
| 2008-09 | Salve Regina | D3 | — | SO | 22 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 1.227 |
| 2008-09 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | SR | 28 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.607 |
| 2007-08 | Salve Regina | D3 | — | FR | 22 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.364 |
| 2007-08 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | JR | 32 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.656 |
| 2006-07 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | SO | 30 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 0.667 |
| 2005-06 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | FR | 29 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.517 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.