IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Kitchener Rangers OHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0964 0.0876 0.4277 0.3888
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 26 7 15 22 0.846
2005-06 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 26 8 10 18 0.692
2004-05 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 25 7 9 16 0.640
2003-04 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 24 5 1 6 0.250

NCAAe Rankings

#17609
Defenseman overall
#1556
Defenseman born in 1987
#1486
in OHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raphael Lajeunesse
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Seitz
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Grant
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.