IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-01 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 30 8 6 14 0.467 0.1012 0.1038 0.3611 0.3703
2024-25 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NCDC 50 30 31 61 1.220 0.4974 0.4976 0.9806 0.9811
2025-26 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NCDC 34 8 25 33 0.971 0.3957 0.3746 0.7802 0.7386
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
57%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4950
Forward overall
#128
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan McKenna
0.79
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Michael Paul Capozzi
0.78
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Joe Birmingham
0.77
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Arthur Mirante
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Nathan Garnier
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vadim Vasjonkin
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.