IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sami Idris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-05-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 10 3 1 4 0.400 0.2209 0.2310 0.5339 0.5582
2001-02 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 25 11 17 28 1.120 0.6185 0.6136 1.4949 1.4830
2002-03 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 30 12 13 25 0.833 0.4601 0.4357 1.1122 1.0533
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Gustavus Adolphus D3 — JR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2005-06 Gustavus Adolphus D3 — SO 26 11 16 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2005-06 · Gustavus Adolphus
+120.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6662
Forward overall
#236
Forward born in 1983
#217
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.