IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Guus van Nes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-14 Country: Netherlands
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 28 9 15 24 0.857 0.2406 0.2512 0.7047 0.7357
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 25 20 45 1.046 0.2938 0.2924 0.8604 0.8563
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 41 16 40 56 1.366 0.5569 0.5188 1.0979 1.0229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 37 6 11 17 0.460
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 29 2 13 15 0.517
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 27 2 3 5 0.185
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 16 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
6%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5206
Forward overall
#260
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fernand-Olivier Perron
University of New England · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.