← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Markell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 1 3 4 0.098 0.0274 0.0286 0.0802 0.0837
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 1 21 22 0.500 0.1404 0.1397 0.4111 0.4090
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 41 6 19 25 0.610 0.2486 0.2315 0.4902 0.4566
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Dartmouth D1 ECAC 32 2 8 10 0.312
2020-21 Dartmouth D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 27 2 1 3 0.111
2018-19 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 31 0 5 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2018-19 · Dartmouth
-12.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5782
Defenseman overall
#1147
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2010-11
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2014-15
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.