IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Solimine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 NMH NE-Prep 28 21 21 42 1.500 0.2972 0.2972 0.6834 0.6834
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 14 3 2 5 0.357 0.1456 0.1456 0.2870 0.2870
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 19 39 58 1.208 0.4926 0.4834 0.9712 0.9530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 32 1 5 6 0.188
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 32 3 3 6 0.188
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Holy Cross
-56.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5696
Forward overall
#251
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.