IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Hahn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Taft NE-Prep 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0903 0.0903 0.1464 0.1464
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 5 1 3 4 0.800 0.2257 0.2257 0.3661 0.3661
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 42 1 2 3 0.071 0.0398 0.0399 0.0577 0.0578
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 6 14 20 0.408 0.2276 0.2187 0.3301 0.3171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12116
Defenseman overall
#2430
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Erlacher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Bazin
Utica · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.