← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Dias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 42 12 14 26 0.619 0.0777 0.0777 0.1954 0.1954
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 37 9 13 22 0.595 0.0746 0.0746 0.1877 0.1877
2021-22 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 42 8 17 25 0.595 0.0747 0.0696 0.1879 0.1750
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 36 10 11 21 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2020-21 · Delaware
+777.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39107
Forward overall
#2156
Forward born in 2001
#1928
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.