IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andreas Lindquist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-07-08 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 38 4 9 13 0.342 0.1350 0.1357 0.4646 0.4669
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
2024-25 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
2023-24 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
2022-23 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
2021-22 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
2020-21 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 28 0 2 2 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2020-21 · Lehigh University
-44.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9222
Defenseman overall
#1128
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Stevens
Southern Maine · 2003-04
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Cassan
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Young
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.