IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Dapron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 38 4 5 9 0.237 0.0297 0.0297 0.0748 0.0748
2021-22 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 44 16 18 34 0.773 0.0970 0.1005 0.2439 0.2527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 6 8 0.296

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41298
Forward overall
#2621
Forward born in 2003
#2180
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Fortin
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2008-09
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
EMack Bentley
Middlebury · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.