← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Benit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 38 0 9 9 0.237 0.0297 0.0297 0.0748 0.0748
2021-22 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 47 4 22 26 0.553 0.0694 0.0696 0.1746 0.1751
2022-23 Red River Spartans USPHL-Premier 42 4 27 31 0.738 0.0965 0.0926 0.2505 0.2403
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9550
Defenseman overall
#2061
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.