IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Chesner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NA3HL 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.0340 0.0340 0.0971 0.0971
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 41 1 8 9 0.220 0.0321 0.0314 0.1075 0.1050
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 — — 36 7 9 16 0.444

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21422
Defenseman overall
#3155
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Horn
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Unklesbay
St. Mary's · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tate Rusk
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.